The Florida Medical Malpractice Pre-Suit Process

Before you can sue a doctor or hospital in Florida, the law puts a strict gate in front of your case. Here is what it is, and why getting it right matters.

As seen in the national media

ABC News  ·  CBS News  ·  FOX News

See Rory's legal commentary in the news

Florida does not let you simply file a medical malpractice lawsuit and start litigating. The law requires a formal pre-suit process first, and it is one of the biggest reasons these cases take a team, resources, and careful hands. Handled correctly, it can move a strong case toward resolution before a trial is ever needed. Handled carelessly, it can end a valid claim before it begins. I take these cases on together with experienced co-counsel who focus on this work, and the pre-suit stage is exactly where that preparation earns its place.

1Expert review andA qualified medical expert confirms
2Notice of intentFormal notice served on each provider
390-dayBoth sides investigate. The
4Provider respondsReject, admit and arbitrate, or settle
5File suitIf the claim has not resolved
The Florida medical malpractice pre-suit process, from expert review to filing suit.

It starts with a qualified expert, not a filing

Before anything is served on a provider, Florida requires a pre-suit investigation, and at its center is a written opinion from a qualified medical expert. That expert has to review the records and confirm that there are reasonable grounds to believe medical negligence occurred. This is a real screen. It means that before your claim is ever presented, a medical professional in the right field has looked at what happened and concluded there is a genuine basis for it. It is also part of why these cases cannot be worked up on the cheap, because that review, and the records behind it, take investment.

The notice of intent

Once the investigation supports the claim, we serve each prospective defendant with a formal notice of intent to begin litigation. That notice does more than announce the claim. It triggers an investigation period during which the providers and their malpractice insurers evaluate the case, and it opens a window of informal discovery, where both sides can request records, take unsworn statements, and gather the information that will shape what comes next.

Importantly, serving the notice pauses the clock. Your deadline to file suit is tolled while the pre-suit process runs, so the time spent here does not eat into the limited window you have. That pause is one of the reasons the deadline in a medical case is more complicated than in an ordinary injury claim, and one more reason to have the timing handled by someone who does this work.

The investigation period, and how it ends

During the investigation period, which commonly runs about 90 days after the providers receive notice, both sides look hard at the facts. At the end of it, each provider responds in one of a few ways. They may reject the claim, which clears the path to file suit. They may offer to admit liability and let the amount of damages be decided by arbitration. Or they may offer to settle. A strong claim, presented well at this stage, sometimes resolves here, which spares the family a longer fight. When it does not, the pre-suit process is what makes the case ready to be filed and tried.

Why this stage decides so much

The pre-suit rules are strict and their deadlines are unforgiving. A misstep, a missed requirement, an incomplete expert opinion, or a notice served the wrong way, can defeat a case that is otherwise strong on the merits. That is the hard truth of Florida medical malpractice practice, and it is why I do not treat these cases as ordinary intake. The same careful, procedure-driven work I have done throughout my career, where a single overlooked detail can decide everything, is what this stage demands. We build the file, secure the right expert, and move through the process the way it has to be done.

Informal discovery, and why it matters

The investigation period is not idle time. Florida’s pre-suit process opens a window of informal discovery, where both sides can request records, take unsworn statements from those involved, and gather information before any lawsuit exists. Used well, this window lets us test the strength of the claim, pin down what the providers will say, and build the foundation of the case early. It also means the pre-suit period is a working phase, not a waiting one, and how thoroughly it is used often shapes what happens next. A claim that is developed carefully during pre-suit arrives at the negotiating table, or at the courthouse, far stronger than one that was merely filed.

This stage rewards preparation and punishes shortcuts. The corroborating expert opinion has to be genuine and specific, the notice has to be served correctly on each prospective defendant, and the deadlines within the process have to be tracked precisely. A misstep here can cost a valid case, which is why the pre-suit stage is handled as carefully as the trial itself.

What happens if the case does not resolve

If the providers reject the claim at the end of the investigation period, or their response does not lead to a fair resolution, the pre-suit process has still done important work. It has forced an early, disciplined look at the evidence, secured the expert support the law requires, and often revealed how the defense intends to fight the case. From there, the lawsuit can be filed, and the matter moves into formal litigation, discovery, depositions, and, if necessary, trial. The groundwork laid during pre-suit carries directly into that next phase, which is one more reason to treat it as the serious foundation it is rather than a box to check.

Why these cases take a team

Between the expert requirement, the records, and the procedural precision the pre-suit process demands, these cases call for real resources and focused attention. Medical malpractice is document-heavy, science-heavy work, the same kind of technical, detail-driven litigation I have done throughout my career, where a single overlooked item can decide the outcome. I represent injured patients and their families, not hospitals or insurers, and because building these cases properly takes resources, I take them on together with experienced co-counsel who focus on this work, pairing my trial and cross-examination experience with their depth. I handle your case personally, and I am prepared to take it to a jury when that is what fair value requires. Learn more about my background.

Common Questions

Can I file a medical malpractice lawsuit in Florida without going through pre-suit?

No. Florida law requires you to complete a pre-suit investigation and serve formal notice before a medical malpractice lawsuit can be filed. Skipping or mishandling these steps can end an otherwise valid case, which is one reason these matters are not do-it-yourself.

What is the corroborating expert affidavit?

Before serving notice, Florida requires a written opinion from a qualified medical expert confirming there are reasonable grounds to believe malpractice occurred. It is a real screen, and it means a qualified professional has reviewed the care before any claim is made.

How long does the pre-suit process take?

There is an investigation period, commonly around 90 days after the providers receive notice, during which both sides evaluate the claim and exchange information. The deadline to file is paused while this plays out. The exact timing depends on the case, and getting it right is part of what we handle.

What happens at the end of pre-suit?

The providers and their insurers respond by rejecting the claim, offering to admit liability and arbitrate the amount of damages, or offering to settle. Only after the process is complete can the lawsuit be filed if it has not resolved.

This page is general information about Florida medical malpractice law, not legal advice, and it does not create an attorney-client relationship. The governing authorities include Chapter 766 of the Florida Statutes, including the pre-suit notice and corroborating-expert-opinion requirements in sections 766.106 and 766.203 and the professional standard of care in section 766.102, and the two-year limitations period and four-year statute of repose in section 95.11(5)(c). The former statutory caps on noneconomic damages in section 766.118 were held unconstitutional in Estate of McCall v. United States, 134 So. 3d 894 (Fla. 2014), and North Broward Hospital District v. Kalitan, 219 So. 3d 49 (Fla. 2017). Every case is different, and past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely on advertisements.

Attorney Rory Safir of Safir Injury and Criminal Defense Law

Let's Talk About Your Case

Your first consultation is free. We’ll explain what you’re facing, what defenses apply, and how we challenge the evidence. Available 24/7; call anytime.

Start Your Free Strategy Session


(727) 761-4318

Call/Text 24/7 / 365

Case Results

$285,000, Pinellas County: a hotel guest slipped on algae left on a pool deck despite repeated reports, and suffered an ankle fracture, a mild brain injury, and lasting balance problems.

Past results are examples only and do not predict, promise, or guarantee the outcome of any other case.

See All Case Results

Client Reviews

“When so many others told me to give up, Rory encouraged me to fight for what I deserved. We won, and my outcome would not have been the same without him.”

Ashley W.

See All Client Reviews

Legal Knowledge, On Demand.

Get in Touch

You’re better Safir than sorry!

Arrested for DUI? Time matters. Complete the form to schedule a free strategy session with attorney Rory Safir. Your information is confidential, and we will follow up promptly.

200+
Client Testimonials
1 of 6
Forensic Lawyer-Scientists in Florida
4.9★
Google Rating
24/7
Availability

Let’s Go Over Your Case


Email Newsletter