Pinellas County Negligent Security Lawyer

When someone is attacked at an apartment, a parking garage, a hotel, or a nightclub, the criminal is rarely the only one at fault, and often not the one who can pay. Florida law requires a property to provide reasonable security against crime it should have seen coming.

As seen in the national media

ABC News  ·  CBS News  ·  FOX News

See Rory's legal commentary in the news

If you were assaulted, robbed, or shot on someone else’s property in Pinellas County, the person who did it is not always the end of the story. Florida law requires a property owner to provide reasonable security against crime the owner should have foreseen, and when the owner does not, the injured person can hold the property responsible. These cases matter because the criminal is often never caught or has nothing to pay, while the property owner had both the duty and the insurance to answer for a preventable harm.

How a negligent security case works

1. ForeseeablePrior robberies, assaults, or shootings the owner knew or should have known about made the crime foreseeable.
2. A dutyThe owner had to provide reasonable security: lighting, working locks and cameras, and guards where needed.
3. Two can answerThe attacker, often never caught, and the insured property owner who let the danger stand.
A negligent security case is built on foreseeability. Prior crime creates a duty to provide reasonable security, and the insured property owner is usually the party who answers.

Where Pinellas County negligent security cases arise

These cases turn up across the county wherever people gather and security gets cut. The downtown St. Petersburg and Clearwater nightlife districts draw crowds and late hours. Apartment complexes countywide, the hotels along the beaches, and the parking garages and lots where people walk to their cars after dark are the settings I see most. What ties them together is a property that had reason to know about the risk and did too little about it, the dark lot, the broken gate, the guard who was promised and never there. The pattern is almost always the same, a place that drew a crowd or sat in a rough area, a known history of trouble, and a security response cut to save money until someone was seriously hurt. That gap between the known risk and the thin response is what a case is built to expose, and it is why the early evidence matters so much, the security a property advertised or promised in a lease against what was working on the night someone was hurt. The firm serves all of Pinellas, with a dedicated St. Petersburg page.

Foreseeability is the whole case

A negligent security case rises or falls on foreseeability, because a property owner’s duty to protect people from the criminal acts of a third party turns on whether that crime was foreseeable. Florida courts have long held that a business owes a duty to protect its patrons from foreseeable criminal acts, and that a residential owner has to keep common areas reasonably safe against them. Foreseeability is built from the history of the place and the area around it, the prior robberies, assaults, and shootings the owner knew about or should have known about from police calls and incident reports, so a property with a documented pattern of violence and thin security is where these cases are strongest. Proving the pattern is the work, and our foreseeability and prior crime page goes deeper.

The apartment presumption is a hurdle, not a wall

Florida gives apartment and other multifamily owners a specific defense worth understanding up front. An owner that provides the security measures the statute lists, things like lighting, locks, and cameras, earns a rebuttable presumption against liability for a third party’s criminal act. Two things keep that from ending a case. It is rebuttable, so proof that the measures were absent, broken, or plainly inadequate to the known risk can overcome it, and it applies only to multifamily residential, not to hotels, bars, retail stores, or parking operations, which have no such presumption. Reading whether the statute even applies, and whether the owner met it, is an early and decisive step, and our apartment presumption page breaks it down.

Two sources of recovery, and where your case is heard

There are usually two people at fault in these cases, the attacker and the property owner who let the danger stand, and they are worlds apart when it comes to recovery, because the attacker is often never caught while the owner carries insurance and had the power to prevent a foreseeable crime. That is why the case is built around the owner’s failure. Pinellas County is part of Florida’s Sixth Judicial Circuit, and a lawsuit is generally filed in the Pinellas County civil court, whose main courthouse is in Clearwater. The evidence that proves these cases disappears fast, so move quickly to preserve the property’s surveillance video and incident reports, get the police report number, and photograph the lighting, the broken locks or gates, and any missing cameras before they are fixed or gone. Our apartment assaults and parking lot and garage pages cover the settings we see most.

I spent years in the criminal courts, so I understand how these crimes happen and how the evidence around them is built, and I use that to prove what a property owner should have seen and failed to prevent. I move fast to lock down the video, the incident reports, and the prior-crime history before they are gone, I hold the owner to the duty the law imposes, and I represent the people harmed by preventable violence, not the properties or their insurers. I came up as a public defender trying cases, so I am ready to take one to a jury, and I handle your case personally throughout. I take these cases across Pinellas and the surrounding counties, and the sooner the video and the prior-crime history are locked down, the stronger the case tends to be. Learn more about my background.

Common Questions

The person who attacked me was never caught. Do I have a case?

Possibly yes. Negligent security cases are brought against the property owner, not the attacker. If the owner should have foreseen the crime from prior violence at or near the property and failed to provide reasonable security, the owner can be responsible even when the attacker is never identified.

The apartment complex says it had security, so is it protected?

Not automatically. Florida gives multifamily owners a rebuttable presumption against liability if they provided the security measures the statute lists, but it can be overcome by showing the measures were missing, broken, or inadequate, and it applies only to apartments, not hotels, bars, retail, or parking.

How do you prove the crime was foreseeable?

Through the history of the property and the surrounding area, the prior robberies, assaults, and shootings shown by police calls, incident reports, and crime data the owner knew or should have known about. A documented pattern of violence paired with thin security is what makes these cases strong.

Who pays if the property owner is liable?

Usually the property’s liability insurance. The attacker is often never caught or has nothing to pay a judgment, while the property owner carries coverage and had the duty and the ability to prevent a foreseeable crime.

Where would my Pinellas County negligent security case be heard?

Pinellas County is in Florida’s Sixth Judicial Circuit, and a lawsuit is generally filed in the Pinellas County civil court, whose main courthouse is in Clearwater. Most claims resolve through insurance first, but preparing every case as if it will be tried protects its value.

Attorney Rory Safir of Safir Injury and Criminal Defense Law

Let's Talk About Your Case

Your first consultation is free. We’ll explain what you’re facing, what defenses apply, and how we challenge the evidence. Available 24/7; call anytime.

Start Your Free Strategy Session


(727) 761-4318

Call/Text 24/7 / 365

In This Section: Negligent Security Lawyer

Case Results

$285,000, Pinellas County: a hotel guest slipped on algae left on a pool deck despite repeated reports, and suffered an ankle fracture, a mild brain injury, and lasting balance problems.

Past results are examples only and do not predict, promise, or guarantee the outcome of any other case.

See All Case Results

Client Reviews

“When so many others told me to give up, Rory encouraged me to fight for what I deserved. We won, and my outcome would not have been the same without him.”

Ashley W.

See All Client Reviews

Legal Knowledge, On Demand.

Get in Touch

You’re better Safir than sorry!

Arrested for DUI? Time matters. Complete the form to schedule a free strategy session with attorney Rory Safir. Your information is confidential, and we will follow up promptly.

200+
Client Testimonials
1 of 6
Forensic Lawyer-Scientists in Florida
4.9★
Google Rating
24/7
Availability

Let’s Go Over Your Case


Email Newsletter